Margin DiagnosticMargin Diagnostic for an Owner-Operated Nursery Group
Audience: Operators£412,000
ANNUAL EBITDA IMPROVEMENT IDENTIFIED
£127,000
FUNDED HOUR DEFICIT UNCOVERED
6.8% to 3.1%
AGENCY SPEND REDUCED
3-week
DIAGNOSTIC ACROSS THE FULL ESTATE
The Situation
An owner-operated nursery group with more than ten settings across two counties was experiencing margin compression despite stable occupancy and growing revenue. Headline occupancy was 82% across the estate. Workforce cost had crept above 72% of revenue. Fees had not been reviewed for two years. The group was profitable but the owners knew the margin should be better and could not identify where the leakage was occurring.
The management accounts provided a group-level P&L but limited visibility at setting level. Funded hour economics had never been calculated at the level of detail required to know whether individual funding streams were cost-neutral or loss-making. The fee structure was inherited from the group's earliest settings and had been applied across subsequent acquisitions without adjustment for local market conditions.
What Litus Did
Litus conducted a full Margin Diagnostic across all five areas over a three-week period.
01
Funded Hour Economics
The cost per funded hour was calculated for each local authority using the four-layer methodology: direct staff cost at ratio, room overhead, setting overhead, and central overhead allocation. The analysis revealed that funded hours were loss-making in two of the four local authority areas the group operated across. The deficit was £0.85 per hour in one authority and £1.20 per hour in the other. At the volume of funded hours delivered, this represented an annual margin drag of approximately £127,000 that was being cross-subsidised by fee-paying provision without the management team knowing.
02
Fee Architecture
A review of the fee structure across the full estate revealed that the majority of settings were priced below the local market median despite delivering above-average quality (all rated Good or Outstanding by Ofsted). Fee increases over the previous two years had averaged 2.8% against cost inflation of 5.4%, creating a compounding real-terms margin erosion of approximately £94,000 per year.
Consumables charges (food, nappies, sun cream) were priced at levels set four years earlier and were generating negative margin against current input costs.
03
Occupancy and Ratios
The headline 82% occupancy masked significant variation. Morning sessions were running at 91% occupancy. Afternoon sessions were at 68%. Three settings had baby rooms operating above statutory ratio by an average of 0.3 staff per session, adding £62,000 per year in unnecessary staffing cost. Two pre-school rooms were running at 55% afternoon occupancy, representing available capacity that was not being marketed.
04
Workforce Cost
Agency spend was running at 6.8% of total workforce cost, more than double the benchmark target. Sickness absence was at 4.2%, driven by two settings with particular absence patterns. Staff turnover at 24% was above the 20% benchmark, and the cost of recruitment was not being tracked.
05
Central Overhead
Central overhead was at 14.1% of revenue against a benchmark of 8-12% for a group of this size. The area management structure had been built for a smaller group and had not been restructured as settings were added. Professional fees had accumulated without periodic review.
The Outcome
The diagnostic identified £412,000 of annual EBITDA improvement opportunity across the five areas. The sequenced implementation plan prioritised fee architecture and funded hour economics (highest impact, fastest to implement) followed by workforce cost reduction and occupancy optimisation.
-
Within Six Months
Fees were restructured across every setting, with increases of 4-8% depending on the local market position. Consumables charges were repriced to cover cost plus margin. The funded hour deficit in two authorities was addressed through a combination of direct representation to the local authority and operational changes to reduce the cost of delivery in those settings.
Agency spend was reduced from 6.8% to 3.1% through a targeted recruitment campaign and improved retention measures. Central overhead was reduced by consolidating the area management structure and renegotiating professional service contracts.
Key InsightHeadline occupancy and group-level P&L reporting can mask six figures of annual margin leakage. Setting-level analysis across all five diagnostic areas is the only way to see it.
Engagement duration3 weeks (diagnostic), followed by implementation support.
DeliverableBoard-ready diagnostic report with £412,000 improvement plan.